Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney took a firm stance Friday regarding Prince Andrew's institutional future. Speaking in Tokyo, the head of government stated that the former Duke of York should no longer be in the line of succession to the British throne.

A moral and political stance

When questioned by the media, including the National Post , about Andrew's continued place in the royal line after his arrest related to the Epstein affair, Mark Carney was unequivocal:

“Personally, yes [he should be removed]. I sincerely believe that his actions, which are deplorable and led to him being stripped of his royal title, necessitate his removal, even if he is far down in the line of succession.”

Currently seventh in line to the throne (just behind Prince Harry's daughter), Andrew represents a symbolic dilemma for the Crown. For Mr. Carney, the distance from the throne does not excuse the continuation of such a privilege.

A historical precedent

On February 19th, his 66th birthday, Prince Andrew became the first member of the royal family in modern history to be arrested. Here are the key points of the ongoing investigation:

1. Reason: Suspicions of "breach of official duties" related to his past ties with Jeffrey Epstein.
2. Police actions: Searches were carried out at two residences linked to the prince.
3. Current status: Released a few hours after his arrest, the investigation continues.

Contrasting reactions

This legal storm is shaking the monarchy and dividing the international scene:

1. King Charles III: The sovereign expressed his "deepest concern" while firmly recalling that "justice must take its course".
2. Donald Trump: The former US president adopted a different tone, calling the arrest a "disgrace" and a "very sad" situation.