The Directorate General of Taxes is at the heart of a heated controversy in Côte d'Ivoire , following accusations made public by internal labor unions. These denunciations, widely reported by the public, have reignited the debate on the functioning of the tax administration and the social climate within it.

Criticisms center on human resources management, social dialogue deemed insufficient by some unions, and the continued employment of retired managers. Union representatives also point to numerous vacant positions, which they believe could undermine the institution's effectiveness.

In response to these accusations, internal clarifications from the administration put several points into perspective. Regarding employees whose contracts were extended beyond retirement age, it was stated that these situations fall within a precise legal framework, governed by higher administrative decisions and not by arbitrary choices made by the DGI (General Directorate of Taxes) management. On the issue of allegedly vacant positions, sources close to the matter indicate a much lower number than publicly stated, with transitional mechanisms already in place to ensure continuity of service.

Regarding social dialogue, management reiterates the existence of regular consultation frameworks between the administration and social partners. However, the persistence of these tensions demonstrates that internal communication remains a major challenge within an institution of strategic importance to the State's public finances.

This controversy arises in a sensitive context, marked by significant reforms, notably the modernization and digitalization of the tax administration. For many observers, the issue goes beyond internal disagreements: it is about preserving the credibility and effectiveness of a key pillar of public governance.

While discussions continue between the various parties, a way out of the crisis through dialogue and transparency appears to be the most anticipated path, in order to prevent these tensions from permanently disrupting the functioning of the DGI and the mobilization of the country's tax resources.